Publications Scientifiques

Full arch atrophic maxillary rehabilitation

I – Boyes-Varley JG, Howes DG, Lownie JF. The zygomaticus implant protocol in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla. SADJ. 2003 Apr;58(3):106–9, 113–4.

.

.

II – Boyes-Varley JG, Howes DG, Lownie JF, Blackbeard GA. Surgical modifications to the
Brånemark zygomaticus protocol in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a
clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Apr;18(2):232–7.

.

.

III – Boyes-Varley JG, Howes DG, Davidge-Pitts KD, Brånemark I, McAlpine JA. A protocol for
maxillary reconstruction following oncology resection using zygomatic implants. Int J
Prosthodont. 2007 Oct;20(5):521–31.

.

.

IV – Esposito M, Cannizzaro G, Soardi E, Pistilli R, Piattelli M, Corvino V, et al. Posterior
atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm-long, 4 mm-wide
implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot
randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012;5(1):19–33.

.

.

V – Pistilli R, Felice P, Cannizzaro G, Piatelli M, Corvino V, Barausse C, et al. Posterior
atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide
implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a
pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013;6(4):359–72.

.

.

VI – Butterworth CJ, Lancaster J, Shah HS. Elective dental extractions and osseointegrated
implant replacement to facilitate transoral endoscopic ENT surgical procedures. J
Laryngol Otol. 2015 Dec;129(12):1234–7.

.

.

VII – Pellegrino G, Tarsitano A, Basile F, Pizzigallo A, Marchetti C. Computer-AidedRehabilitation of Maxillary Oncological Defects Using Zygomatic Implants: A Defect-Based Classification. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Dec;73(12):2446.e1-2446.e11.

.

.

VIII – Butterworth CJ, Rogers SN. The zygomatic implant perforated (ZIP) flap: a new techniquefor combined surgical reconstruction and rapid fixed dental rehabilitation following low-level maxillectomy. Int J Implant Dent. 2017 Dec;3(1):37.

.

.

IX – Chuka R, Abdullah W, Rieger J, Nayar S, Seikaly H, Osswald M, et al. Implant Utilization
and Time to Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Conventional and Advanced Fibular Free Flap
Reconstruction of the Maxilla and Mandible. Int J Prosthodont. 2017 Jun;30(3):289–94.

.

.

X – Dattani A, Richardson D, Butterworth CJ. A novel report on the use of an oncology
zygomatic implant-retained maxillary obturator in a paediatric patient. Int J Implant
Dent. 2017 Dec;3(1):9.

.

.

XI – Egbert N, Ahuja S, Selecman A, Wicks R. Angulated Implants for Fabrication of Implant
Supported Fixed Partial Denture in the Maxilla. J Dent (Shiraz). 2017 Dec;18(4):304–13.

.

.

XII – Esposito M, Barausse C, Balercia A, Pistilli R, Ippolito DR, Felice P. Conventional drills vs
piezoelectric surgery preparation for placement of four immediately loaded zygomatic
oncology implants in edentulous maxillae: results from 1-year split-mouth randomised
controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(2):147–58.

.

.

XIII – Howes D. Angled Implant Design to Accommodate Screw-retained Implant-supported
Prostheses. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017 Jul;38(7):458–63; quiz 464.

.

.

XIV – Offord D, Mathieson G, Kingsford N, Matthys C, Glibert M, De Bruyn H. Peri-implant health, clinical outcome and patient-centred outcomes of implant-supported overdentures in the mandible and the maxilla. BDJ Open. 2017;3:17017.

.

.

XV – Pellegrino G, Taraschi V, Vercellotti T, Ben-Nissan B, Marchetti C. Three-Dimensional Implant Positioning with a Piezosurgery Implant Site Preparation Technique and an Intraoral Surgical Navigation System: Case Report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jun;32(3):e163–5.

.

.

XVI – Van Weehaeghe M, De Bruyn H, Vandeweghe S. A prospective, split-mouth study comparing tilted implants with angulated connection versus conventional implants with angulated abutment. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Dec;19(6):989–96.

.

.

XVII – Felice P, Barausse C, Pistilli V, Piattelli M, Ippolito DR, Esposito M. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long × 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(2):175–87.

.

Single implants in the aesthetic zone

I – Hall JAG, Payne AGT, Purton DG, Torr B. A randomized controlled clinical trial of conventional and immediately loaded tapered implants with screw-retained crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Feb;19(1):17–9.

.

.

II – Hall JAG, Payne AGT, Purton DG, Torr B, Duncan WJ, De Silva RK. Immediately restored, single-tapered implants in the anterior maxilla: prosthodontic and aesthetic outcomes after 1 year. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Mar;9(1):34–45.

.

.

III – Kurtzman GM, Dompkowski DF, Mahler BA, Howes DG. Off-Axis Implant placement for anatomical considerations using the Co-Axis Implant. Inside Dentistry. 2008;12(5):96–102.

.

.

IV – Brown SDK, Payne AGT. Immediately restored single implants in the aesthetic zone of
the maxilla using a novel design: 1-year report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011
Apr;22(4):445–54.

.

.

V – Vandeweghe S, Cosyn J, Thevissen E, Van den Berghe L, De Bruyn H. A 1-year prospective study on Co-Axis implants immediately loaded with a full ceramic crown. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 May;14 Suppl 1:e126-138.

.

.

VI – Ahuja S, Egbert N, Jain V, Cagna D. Managing maxillary proclination with novel designed
angulated implants. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Jun;17(2):203–6.

.

.

VII – Howes D. Angled Implant Design to Accommodate Screw-retained Implant-supported
Prostheses. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017 Jul;38(7):458–63; quiz 464.

.

.

VIII – Tawse-Smith A, Ma S, Duncan WJ, Gray A, Reid MR, Rich AM. Implications of Wear at the
Titanium-Zirconia Implant-Abutment Interface on the Health of Peri-implant Tissues. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jun;32(3):599–609.

.

.

IX – Chu SJ, Östman P-O, Nicolopoulos C, Yuvanoglu P, Chow J, Nevins M, et al. Prospective
Multicenter Clinical Cohort Study of a Novel Macro Hybrid Implant in Maxillary Anterior
Postextraction Sockets: 1-Year Results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent.
2018;38(Suppl):s17–27.

.

Immediate singe molar replacement

I – Vandeweghe S, De Ferrerre R, Tschakaloff A, De Bruyn H. A wide-body implant as an alternative for sinus lift or bone grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jun;69(6):e67-74.

.

.

II – Vandeweghe S, Hattingh A, Wennerberg A, Bruyn HD. Surgical protocol and short-term clinical outcome of immediate placement in molar extraction sockets using a wide body implant. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2011;2(3):e1.

.

.

III – Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NHM, Payne AGT, Schwass DR, Duncan WJ. Insertion torque of immediate wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis. Quintessence Int. 2012 Oct;43(9):e115-126.

.

.

IV – Vandeweghe S, Ackermann A, Bronner J, Hattingh A, Tschakaloff A, De Bruyn H. A retrospective, multicenter study on a novo wide-body implant for posterior regions. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Apr;14(2):281–92.

.

.

V – Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NHM, Duncan WJ, de Silva RK, Cullinan MP, Schwass D, et al. Immediate single implant restorations in mandibular molar extraction sockets: a controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 May;24(5):484–96.

.

.

VI – Smith RB, Tarnow DP. Classification of molar extraction sites for immediate dental
implant placement: technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jun;28(3):911–6.

.

.

VII – Hattingh AC, De Bruyn H, Ackermann A, Vandeweghe S. Immediate Placement of
Ultrawide-Diameter Implants in Molar Sockets: Description of a Recommended
Technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Feb;38(1):17–23.

.

.

VIII – Theye CEG, Hattingh A, Cracknell TJ, Oettlé AC, Steyn M, Vandeweghe S. Dento-alveolar measurements and histomorphometric parameters of maxillary and mandibular first molars, using micro-CT. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Aug;20(4):550–61.

.

Surface, peri-implantitis and bone loss

I – Svanborg LM, Andersson M, Wennerberg A. Surface characterization of commercial oral implants on the nanometer level. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2010 Feb;92(2):462–9.

.

.

II – Vandeweghe S, De Bruyn H. The effect of smoking on early bone remodeling on surface modified Southern Implants®. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Sep;13(3):206–14.

.

.

III – Vandeweghe S, Cosyn J, Thevissen E, Teerlinck J, De Bruyn H. The influence of implant
design on bone remodeling around surface-modified Southern Implants®. Clin Implant
Dent Relat Res. 2012 Oct;14(5):655–62.

.

.

IV – Vandeweghe S, De Bruyn H. A within-implant comparison to evaluate the concept of platform switching: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012;5(3):253– 62.

.

.

V – Tawse-Smith A, Ma S, Wu H, Yeah A, Van Vuuren LJ, van Vuuren WJ. Changes in surface
characteristics of moderately roughened grade IV titanium disc following a standardised
implantoplasty technique. Braz J Periodontol. 2015 Jun;25(02):22–33.

.

.

VI – Lasserre JF, Toma S, Bourgeois T, El Khatmaoui H, Marichal E, Brecx MC. Influence of low direct electric currents and chlorhexidine upon human dental biofilms. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2016 Nov;2(2):146–54.

.

.

VII – Tawse-Smith A, Atieh MA, Tompkins G, Duncan WJ, Reid MR, Stirling CH. The effect of piezoelectric ultrasonic instrumentation on titanium discs: a microscopy and trace elemental analysis in vitro study. Int J Dent Hyg. 2016 Aug;14(3):191–201.

.


Menu